|
|
|
How to create Youtube community?
|
YouTube Community Structures
|
0 |
Jul 22 2009, 8:34 AM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jul 22 2009, 8:34 AM EDT
Watch
Hi Guys,
I like to create youtube community for my official work. Can anyone help me guide me on creating youtube community? Any help is been appreciated.
Thanks
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
software for editing video
|
Downloading and Converting Online Video for Editing
|
2 |
Mar 26 2009, 5:54 AM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 11 2009, 10:53 AM EDT
Watch
the videos your group produces look really professional - do you have advice on the software you use to edit them?
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: software for editing video
By: ,
Mar 26 2009, 5:54 AM EDT
Thanks leschia, just saw your reply. Have just made my first video using windows media maker which worked well enough for basic editing, but will definitely have a look at the software you mention.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
|
You Have Used Me as a Fish Long Enough: Documentary
|
Digital Ethnography at KSU Project Wiki
|
1 |
Mar 15 2009, 6:17 AM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jan 15 2009, 6:38 PM EST
Watch
I thought this was interesting and relevant for our research subjects. It covers the beginnings of cognitive science and involvement with the CIA during the Cold War. It discusses the way humans are made up of what we remember and how we perceive our memories, and if scientists could figure out (and they have tried) to control human memories, then they have the power to control their behavior as well. It focuses on the Cold War era and ends with some indirect questions about the future.
The video is made up of 6 parts of 10 minuted each...here is part 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JR5N_AmbpOE
Enjoy,
Jess
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
|
why are we even doing this?
|
0 |
Feb 19 2009, 10:52 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Feb 19 2009, 10:52 PM EST
Watch
The posted questions bring my thoughts to forest people, hiding quietly as alien safari-tourists pass through, unknowing that they are being watched. Or another image of indian warrior scouts crouching low to avoid being spotted as a wagon train passes by in the distance.
Anonymous allows a choice to remain un-connected and not contactable. Anonymous allows not having to make a promise or live up to a commitment. Anonymous provides a cloak of protection for one with observations, hypothesese, or judgements becaues they do not have to be asked about thse nor do they have to defend their position. So anonymous fits with in the concept of being uninvolved.
Being uninvolved can be a tragedy. A truck driver might get pulled from his rig and beaten by a gang if the nearby residents are uninvolved. Pursesnatchers, muggers, theives of all sorts and other maliciously minded persons can perform their anti-social acts with impunity if those nearby are anonymous.
Anonymous can protect an individual but it can also mean no protection for others who need contact.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Second Life on Ted Talks
|
Discussion Forum
|
0 |
Jan 20 2009, 8:51 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jan 20 2009, 8:51 PM EST
Watch
For all of those who are interested in 2nd life as a topic - this isn't entirely relevant and talks a lot about the creation of 2nd life and kind of generating its own hype, but the Q&A had some decent stuff. Below is the website and then the start times of blurbs that I found interesting and a bit about what that blurb is about.
Philip Rosedale on Second Life
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/the_inspiration_of_second_life.html
19 minutes – avatar of speaker (Rosedale)
21:47 – description of demographics of 2nd life
25 minutes – good blurb about “human experience moving onto the internet” as horrifying and response to it. “being present in a virtual world… and having a good life there is a challenge… we must be better than ourselves… be more tolerant, be smarter, be more adaptable”
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
YouTube Poop
|
Discussion Forum
|
0 |
Jan 19 2009, 8:18 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jan 19 2009, 8:18 PM EST
Watch
In response to the forwarded YouTube video from Dr. Wesch -
Question - did anybody notice the life-sized human hand (mannequin?) in the video? I just found it interesting...
Comment - If anybody didn't know what the YouTube poop meant, Urban dictionary had a good definition of YouTube Poop (I didn't really know exactly what that meant). http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=YouTube%20Poop
The 6th entry has an interesting bit about language coming into use from "poopers"
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Music
|
First draft of "Project Trailers"
|
1 |
Jan 6 2009, 1:17 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jan 6 2009, 2:33 AM EST
Watch
I found www.mobygratis.com to be great for music. It's free music from the electronic artist, Moby. After registering, you can get his instrumentals and b-sides.
His youtube account has a whole playlist of movies and films that have used his music at: http://www.youtube.com/mobygratis
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: Music
By: ,
Jan 6 2009, 1:17 PM EST
I've used http://fourbees.com/ for royalty free music for past media projects
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
|
a funny thing!
|
Anonymity Project
|
0 |
Jan 3 2009, 6:35 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Jan 3 2009, 6:35 PM EST
Watch
i just joined this site and the wiki yelled at me, it said "don't be anonymous, upload a profile pic!" i'm not much for coincidences so i took it as an ironic sign...i had to share :P
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
test
|
Fair Use Statistics
|
0 |
Dec 15 2008, 12:02 PM EST by
|
|
|
Thread started: Dec 15 2008, 12:02 PM EST
Watch
test
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
mikessawyer |
|
Fair Use Standards
|
Fair Use Statistics
|
0 |
Oct 26 2008, 1:42 PM EDT by
mikessawyer |
|
|
Thread started: Oct 26 2008, 1:42 PM EDT
Watch
What standards are you using to evaluate fair use?
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
andrewe2 |
|
Project Status
|
Spring 2008 Student Projects
|
0 |
Apr 1 2008, 3:20 PM EDT by
andrewe2 |
|
|
Thread started: Apr 1 2008, 3:20 PM EDT
Watch
This re-calibrating has set me back a bit, but hard data should be collected and on par with everyone else by Wednesday evening - fyi.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
the "how not to steal a Sidekcick" story
|
The Moron vs. McFearsome's Mobb- the good and bad of the Digg community in Action
|
0 |
Mar 26 2008, 8:13 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 26 2008, 8:13 PM EDT
Watch
Interesting story. There are interesting parallels here: http://www.evanwashere.com/StolenSidekick/ and an interesting comparison to be made with the Dog Poop Girl of Korea: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog_poop_girl
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
Anotherqueerjubu |
|
Studies of media ecology and economic factors
|
Guiding Insights
|
0 |
Mar 24 2008, 5:42 PM EDT by
Anotherqueerjubu |
|
|
Thread started: Mar 24 2008, 5:42 PM EDT
Watch
While it may be true that within the academic community that studies of media ecology overlook economic factors, I would submit that there are hundreds of people in my industry — advertising and direct marketing — that consider this on an ongoing basis in the service of selling. Meanwhile, market analysts consider the economic factors of media ecology as they rate investing in Google versus The New York Times Company. Perhaps I misunderstand your use of terminology since this is the academic world. However the business world is certainly looking at how the economics of the media environment are changing due to rapidly shifting media usage. Academic studies of media ecology may overlook political implications but I am certain that political research firms have written a lot about this. Of course, it would be proprietary information, something there is less and less of in the new digital world. Which makes it all the more valuable.
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
|
|
Jessiestone |
|
andrew:
|
Mediascape Visualizations Sandbox
|
0 |
Mar 20 2008, 12:05 AM EDT by
Jessiestone |
|
|
Thread started: Mar 20 2008, 12:05 AM EDT
Watch
andrew- this is the first time i've seen your visualization-- it ROCKSSS!!! i set it as my desktop background, SIMPLY beautiful :)
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
andrewe2 |
|
What constitutes editing?
|
YouTube Statistics
|
1 |
Mar 18 2008, 7:25 AM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 18 2008, 12:34 AM EDT
Watch
So an over site on my part in entering data on the "edited" field of our YouTube stake-out - and Dr. Wesch's subsequent inquiry as to what we consider to constitute editing - has prompted me to post the following. Hopefully this will lead to some kind of fruitful discussion for anyone interested. None of this is intended to alter any data already collected; simply to raise a discussion.
In reviewing my notes on the videos I had watched with the specific intention of identifying what I found to qualify as an edit, I've come across a kind of dilemma regarding some possible sub-categories to be considered as an edit, along with some other tenuous "stuff".
The majority of my videos either lacked edits entirely (i.e. continuous user-gen footage), or were illegally uploaded talk shows, dramas, etc. - the edited content of which was NOT GENERATED BY THE USER. I also had instances in which the user had made edits in the 'anything qualifies' sense that seems to have been standard with the class, which I did not factor as significant in my reading of the categorizing of our videos as edits (many, for example, were extremely minute). Some of you may consider that a mis-reading, but if so, I'd encourage you to explain your perspective. As I take it, our use of the label "edited" connotes that the user is aware of and has demonsted the editing process beyond uploading a video and throwing a soundtrack on top of this (e.g. scene transitions, text, or speed alterations). The edit should evidence at least a rudimentary use of editing beyond dropping either video or sound into, let's say, Vegas, and then simply rendering and uploading the work.
My point being - as we have currently classified it, edited content can include work that actually lacks any real editing whatsoever on behalf of the user - beyond their superficially having rendered the material in some form of editing software. Thoughts?
0
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: What constitutes editing?
By: ,
Mar 18 2008, 7:25 AM EDT
This should not be a problem. We can just filter out all those we marked "professional" and run the "edited" stats on the user-generated content. We can then have two stats for "edited" content - one for all uploads, and another for UGC only.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
bookerblue |
|
my random thoughts on internet after Postman
|
Resource Notes
|
2 |
Mar 13 2008, 4:46 PM EDT by
mk7718 |
|
|
Thread started: Feb 26 2008, 3:58 PM EST
Watch
-One thing we've failed to pay attention to is online gaming sites. People log in a massive amount of time on these sites at both school and work. These are purely for entertainment purposes and are often accessed during traditionally productive time periods. Moreover, the medium they are transmitted through often varies from game-to-game-- some allow for a greater degree of socializing than others (e.g. Xbox live, yahoogames, etc.). An enormous amount of socializing occurs on these, and they are becoming more prominent all of the time (particularly xbox live) and could very well represent one of the most obvious forebearers of internet-computer-tv integration-- a interestingly hybridized revolution in medium.
-If the medium is the message we need to face the fact that the internet is now an ever-changing, ever-evolving and ever-growing amalgamation of a wide variety of mediums. As such, we should certainly not focus on it as being a single medium or, perhaps instead, state that our purpose is to analyze a particular medium within the internet.
-Furthermore, the internet allows users to select which medium they wish to access. This means that the internet mediums that are most-accessed may actually reflect the various desires of users to a greater degree than any previous mediums. This in turn could mean that the message of the medium is, to a previously unprecedented degree, becoming the message of the masses. However we must be cautious; until nearly all users are given the ability to customize and even create mediums that completely conform to their own desires, this message continues to be structured (by structured structures predisposed to act as structuring structures...? My apologies for mangling this quote.)
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: my random thoughts on internet after Postman
By: mk7718,
Mar 13 2008, 4:46 PM EDT
What about mobile phones as a medium of access to the Internet ... means that Internet is always with you ... services like fring let you take your internet voice community along with you and be online all the time ... and then there are services like QIK (www.qik.com) which allow you to stream live video to the internet directly from the cellphone. What consequences can this have on security and privacy? then you also have services like Google Mobile Maps which can triangulate your position from the cellphone infrastructure and its pretty accurate for GSM networks atleast ... I seldom notice big error of position on it ... its only a matter of time when Google can and probably will make this information publicly accessible, which can mean that you can track people in real time on Google Earth ... again what impact will this have on security and privacy ... things are changing, so is the way we perceive privacy and security ...
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
|
Birth of a new God
|
Power Structures of YouTube
|
0 |
Mar 13 2008, 4:13 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 13 2008, 4:13 PM EDT
Watch
I think once the current God i.e. Google starts to interfere or perhaps I should say that once their interference becomes noticeable, another God will emerge parallel to Google, with a new universe parallel to the Google universe (Google, Gmail, Youtube, Google-Earth ...) and this basically is in contrast to some real world beliefs that there is only one God ...
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
Please enter some text (at least 3 characters).
|
Participatory Coding
|
1 |
Mar 13 2008, 3:43 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 10 2008, 5:29 PM EDT
Watch
To me, editable text seems like one of the critical advantages that the Internet has over TV. Not everyone can participate in discussion via video and images (yet); text is simple and instant. While this article makes a valid point that graphics may get beefed-up on the net in the coming years (possibly with certain more corporate sites taking advantage of this feature), I doubt the element of text chat will ever be entirely eliminated.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: Please enter some text (at least 3 characters).
By: ,
Mar 13 2008, 3:43 PM EDT
There is a continuous change going on around the Internet ... from newsgroups to IRC to blogs to services like MSN, Skype and now oovoo ... basically in the start communication was through email, interaction through newsgroups, then we moved to IRC for live communication, then over to instant messengers and now mainly to voice and video conferencing ... all this is being promoted by the easy access to increased bandwidth ... I think its the same case with PicLens ... the way I use it is that I navigate first using PicLens, which is more fun and I think faster in finding the visual content you are looking for, and then perhaps go to the concerned page to read more about the content ... but with the wider access to bandwidth, the visual content on pages is also increasing ... so I think that its only a matter of time till voice and video will become the primary medium for some sites ... after all its how we interact in the real world, so its probably more fun.
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
|
Categories??
|
List of YouTube Uses
|
0 |
Mar 11 2008, 3:25 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 11 2008, 3:25 PM EDT
Watch
I think we need to add a new section about what topics are most popular in each section to really describe them. For instance Science and Technology: space stuff, video games, new gadgets, Tech guru talks
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
|
|
bottom-up categories
|
YouTube Categories
|
2 |
Mar 10 2008, 10:31 PM EDT by
|
|
|
Thread started: Mar 10 2008, 9:10 PM EDT
Watch
hey dudes and dudettes, can anyone help brainstorm on bottom-up categories? or perhaps a better way to name what the user actually uses?
1
out of
1 found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
Do you?
Show Last Reply
|
|
Last Reply:
RE: bottom-up categories
By: ,
Mar 10 2008, 10:31 PM EDT
Check out this article on Swarm Theory. It covers some of the different aspects of top-down vs. bottom-up theory and the impact on Web 2.0 (Wikipedia as a major example).
http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2008/02/the_bottom_is_n.php
out of
found this valuable.
Do you find this valuable?
|
|
